# Life and Musings of Ed

## Blind Hog _____ 3

In Uncategorized on 3 June 16 at 8:42 pm

## Sound Worship Communication

In Sound Worship, Uncategorized on 16 March 16 at 7:55 pm

1.   An,  “I support and am interested in being a part of this community” type      response to the original email — see below [attached] — was received from: Dr. Albert Norwood, Pat Davis, The Rt. Rev. Doc Loomis, and Ellen Loomis. Thank you.
2. I received suggested additions to the community: Dwayne Wilson, Barbara Swigart, Barbara Landry, and Pastor Tim
3. The Rt. Rev. Doc Loomis has a (not so secret) talent for graphic design and has provided me with a few great suggestions for a logo.
I will send a follow up email to the “responders” listed above, as well as any one else who would be interested in helping to launch our Sound Worship community to arrange a quick face to face some time in the next week or so.

In the mean time, I would love to build a much larger email list of musical moles [men or ladies –  engaged spiritually] — hmmm,..  tried to do something creative there, but was actually just recalling a children’s book about a musical mole family, which I read to my children.  Anyway — I would greatly appreciate your networking assistance at this point in our journey.  The next time you [non-responders] hear from me, I will be inviting you to a May gathering. It will be a worship and fellowship oriented musical exploration.  Looking forward to stepping into a wonderful season time with you.

I invite you now to join me in prayer, to reread the last email as a refresher,  to review the vision for this community, and to reflect on what worship leaders can do to maximize participation in worship — particularly the singing aspect of worship.
Peace and blessings,

Greetings in Christ!

I am contacting you because of the love you have shown for worship, and because of the musical talents God has given you.  In hopes that the vision I outline below resonates with you, I am inviting you to join me in launching this project.
God has given me a vision of a group of like-minded musicians with hearts and passion for worshiping Jesus. This group would be…
• ecumenical, rich, diverse, supportive
• prayerfully seeking to maximize congregational engagement and participation in musical worship
• focused on exploring use(s) of music in worship — worship done in spirit and in truth
• actively learning, teaching, disciplining, and developing talent
• gathering monthly for about 1.5 hours – fellowship, breaking bread together, teaching/presentation, short time of worship
• developing resources and collaboration with projects, — such as musical mission, collaborative song writing, community events/revival/concert/…musical assist teams for church plants
• moving venue/host/leaders for each monthly gathering — emphasizing support for all churches represented and ideally equalizing travel time; this also allows exploration of different acoustic spaces!

A short time ago I posted a draft timeline for getting this Sound Worship community group off the ground – https://jedward706.wordpress.com/2016/02/13/sound-worship/

Launch Timeline
Since last summer (2015) I have been prodded by the Holy Spirit and have floated balloons about getting together with Christian musicians and worship leaders in my community to study, fellowship, create, play and ultimately give Glory to God and worship Him more effectively through music. There is a unifying aspect to the gift of music, as well as an  incredible ability for it to reach deep into our souls and touch us  intimately at emotional and spiritual levels often unreachable in other ways.  Exploring this with like minded people, as the Right Reverend Doc Loomis says, is one primary piece of a vision for pursuing the formation of the Sound Worship community group.  In delineating the vision a bit more,  I would add, active worship in spirit and in truth, teaching and disciplining, and spreading the wisdom this ecumenical group gains far and wide.

Much more regarding specific goals, strategies, and logistics will be forthcoming, but for now…a draft timeline to prepare for the launch [May 2016]:

1. Feb. 21st: Core group of 4-12 musicians contacted, briefed, and tasked [appropriately based on gifts/aptitude/passion]
1. March 6th: Vision [written, ready to publish/broadcast], logo [designed], email list initiated [mail chimp? Google group? …consistent, shareable, expandable, “format” established], first venue for first gathering [secured, scheduled] , and outline for or “order of service” established — what will the meetings look like?
1. March 20th: Invitations sent for first gathering
1. March 27th: First event presentation and logistics — food, sound system, seating, meeting space set up — Online presence development with sharing of products — new songs, collaborative creative effort begun
1. April 10th: Follow up invitations with full detail
1. April 17th: Second event planning underway — leader and co-leader designated, location/space hunt underway
1. Early May — @ consistent monthly day and time  Sound Worship Launched

So — would you please consider joining me in tackling the highlighted activities,in order to launch the Sound Worship community group?

Already a week behind, I am sending out this invitation to those for whom I have email addresses now.  There are still a few folks I would like to include — I think I have or can quickly find phone numbers for some and can probably find the rest on Facebook.

FYI — the current list I am working with includes:

Ellen and the Right Reverend “Doc” Loomis
Erin and Joshua Mace
Bill Barber
Dr. Albert Norwood
Tajuana Hill
Pat Davis
Dwayne Wilson
Barbara Swigart
Barbara Landry
Pastor Tim
[…and those for whom I don’t yet have email addresses —

Phil Routszong
Hugh Taylor
Brandon Mills
Timmie Raynor III
Laurence Stith
Sunnie Gail Ballou

If there is someone you know should be a part of this, please send me contact information.  Especially if you see them bringing a different style, expertise, culture, denomination, etc. … to this authentic worshiping group.

I will plan to have Ellen Loomis join me in planning for the first group gathering at All Saint’s Anglican Church in early May.  In the next week or two, I would love to touch base with as many of those on my initial list as possible to gage interest, do some brainstorming,  and get some help with launch oriented tasks.

Please respond with feedback … I am eagerly looking forward to joining arms with any who feel this call as I do and who see great potential for enveloping Eastern NC in joyful noise — with a purpose !  Let’s seek to glorify God and see how hearts in our community are moved, healed, transformed, …

Peace and blessings,

## Healing the Brokenness – Part 1

In Uncategorized on 2 March 16 at 8:55 am

After a couple posts about the brokenness I am seeing in public education, which do not even begin to fully capture the extent and scope, nor do they do justice to the many dedicated professionals in the business, who strive daily for academic excellence, loving and supporting all students to the best of their ability, I will been a series outlining a generally discarded notion that a solid, biblical, Christian worldview contains solutions and healing for the brokenness.

#### Purpose of Education

Consider the implicit, if not explicitly stated, purpose of public education.  What I am hearing from administrators and even from most public school teachers is that the purpose of education is to “get good grades, so you have opportunities to get into college, and can get a better job to make more money”.  This can be seen as a rather communistic view point;  produce good workers for the good of society and to improve the economy.  Neil Postman addresses the lack of a legitimate motivating purpose or narrative, and offers some alternatives,  in his book The End of Education.

The consequences of this “better job, more money, better economy” narrative can be seen throughout the system.  One quick example is that high schools, at least in NC, are evaluated on criteria such as percentage of students graduating with “math rigor”, which translates into a forced march for many students into Integrated Math 3 [which is similar to Algebra 2 with the proof portion of geometry and a bit of statistics].  Many of the students in my regular Math 3 courses have not even passed the prerequisite course, Math 2, and are either taking Math 2 concurrently in an online “credit recovery” class or have been promised that they would get credit for Math 2 if they pass Math 3.  The bottom line here is that a significant number of my students, who have no aptitude for rigorous mathematics or STEM field pursuits, and would be better served (IMHO), taking business mathematics, accounting, applied vocational mathematics courses or coding [as a short list of examples], are forced into college preparatory math courses for which they are woefully under prepared and in which they have no interest.  Why? Because all paths in the high school now lead to either community college or university.  Strong vocational and trade programs seem to be a thing of the past.  Is it any wonder that the “free college tuition” mantra has been taken up by many.  Students are being told that “success” means going to college.  Meanwhile, it seems more and more difficult to find skilled tradesmen [general term — not meant to be gender specific].  Of course, what could be wrong with pushing all students through slightly higher levels of mathematics then the typical Algebra 1 level which was a generally accepted minimum standard a few decades ago?  I am addressing this by beginning to write a comprehensive K-12 mathematics curriculum.  Beginning with middle and high school specifics, while outlining ideas for elementary levels, I will be putting together documents over the next year.  Stay tuned.

Contrast this with a Christian worldview, which provides a narrative, which is very different.  We are all called to glorify God, who is our creator, the creator of the universe, the very essence and definition of love, who is infinite, omnipotent, omnipresent, the Truth, our Savior and Lord.  He is worthy of study and has revealed Himself in the Scriptures [reading and writing – as “people of the Word”, is pretty important], as well as in His creation [science is another way to understand our Creator — and we are to be good stewards of His creation]. Being created in His image, we also create and invent and express our praise through arts and seek to develop God given talents and gifts in order to serve others in love as modeled by Jesus Christ.  To better serve and love one another, it is important to understand history, culture, psychology, anthropology, and social sciences.  There is a richness, excitement, and depth to the purpose of education from a Christian worldview, that seems totally absent from the public square, where Christian educators are essentially told to keep their religion and bible and primary reason for teaching to themselves.

So, I feel like this is just a teaser and I am running out of time today to more fully flesh out this first path to healing post. To be continued…

## Do Hard Things – In Education

In Uncategorized on 24 February 16 at 9:47 pm

During the current season, I will be focusing on two fronts with posts — Education and Sound Worship.  Digging through some old files, I found something I typed up as a study guide for a high school Sunday school class, based on a great book by the Harris twins.  I don’t think my study guide attachment, which is pulled pretty directly from the text, is complete, but before I dig in and both revise and complete it, I would love some feedback from fellow Christians.   Do you think this message resonates with most teens today?  I would be interested in your comments.

Do Hard Things_AllSaintsHSSundaySchool

## Brokenness in Education – Part 2

In Uncategorized on 18 February 16 at 3:53 pm

A few days ago, I was lamenting the serious student struggles I have been seeing in my high school mathematics classes.  Students seem to be coming into the integrated math 3 course, very unprepared and I was suggesting that a core issue is related to an fundamental clash of world views, between my Christian perspective regarding education and the pervasive systemic view represented in public education after “religion” was supposedly removed [1962 — teacher led prayer].  Discussion and argument regarding, definitions of religion, what teachers can and cannot legally do in the classroom [teacher led prayers, proselytizing, …], what “religion”or what belief system has come to dominate public education,… could gone on indefinitely, but I wanted to go a different direction in this post.

Having a background in quality improvement, I tend to constantly be on the look out for systemic issues, and am fascinated when I see struggling or failing organizations populated by many truly hard working and well meaning individuals.  Such is the case in my current school.  I honestly enjoy and respect the mathematics faculty at my school. They work hard, have a pretty solid understanding of the subject material, legitimately care about students, etc. and  I think our principal genuinely cares deeply about the students.  So how can it be that such a large percentage of my students accept Mike Rowe’s statement [see previous post] and are so lost and confused about basic arithmetic or simple algebraic concepts as they enter a sophomore or junior level high school math class?   Why do I find it nearly impossible to fully embrace and uphold a classroom environment that is modeled after my “philosophy of education” statement [see previous post]?

I could discuss metrics placed on principals and school districts by state DPI folks, and note that many of these seem straight forward and good, while effectively being counter  productive to real learning as they are implemented.  I could discuss other cultural and socioeconomic factors which contribute to the malaise.  I could discuss the misguided attempts to force everyone to head to college, while neglecting solid vocational training in plumbing, carpentry, electrical and automotive trades, etc. I could discuss and ponder crazy individual student data and situations, such as a student who had 80’s and low 90’s as grades for 6-8th grade math classes, but then has not passed a regular math class in high school; getting by by doing “credit recovery” online,and finding themselves in a math 3 class for which they are completely unprepared and in which they are understandably distraught and frustrated.  However, I just want to reiterate what was intended as a key point in the previous post, because I do not think that point was clearly communicated.

The solution and “fix” for all that is broken in education should start with a traditional or orthodox Christian worldview as the foundation.  A path that ultimately brings Glory to God and recognizes every student as a unique individual, created in God’s image, with a purpose, and with gifts and potential for good that should be encouraged and developed, is what I will pursue.

Of course, this statement just raises a number of other questions.  What does this mean for public education, and can the course of this massive enterprise be corrected?  Or, would this force us to look to vouchers and the privatization of education as the solution?  Stay tuned – or comment and share your remedy – I think most seem to agreed that some remedy or fix is needed.

## Reverse Thinking

In Uncategorized on 22 March 12 at 9:20 pm

Reverse Thinking — Clever Palindrome

I really enjoyed this cleverly presented bit of wisdom and lovely palindrome. Do you need to reverse your thinking?  I sure do on occasion and this was a reminder, received with gratitude.

## Water Drop at 2000 Frames Per Second

In Uncategorized on 22 February 10 at 5:54 pm

Mind blowing water droplets can be seen bouncing when viewed with high speed film.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about "Water Drop at 2000 Frames Per Second", posted with vodpod

## President Obama’s Address to American Students

In Christian Education, Life and living, Uncategorized on 14 September 09 at 3:58 pm

The President encourages students to overcome and work hard to succeed.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

## Format for LaTeX Homework II

In LaTeX, My LaTeX Experience, Uncategorized on 4 September 09 at 11:36 am

It has been really interesting to note that of all posts, the LaTeX post has gotten the most hits.  I consider myself a novice user, who loves the concept of “content focus”,  with lots of specific publishing and formatting options.  I offer a simple template for basic problem solving with this post.  A link to the  .pdf result (when compiled)  is provided here. PhysHwkTemplate2

% Physics Homework Template using MEMOIR class
\documentclass[openany]{memoir}

%preamble
\usepackage{calc}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{graphicx}

%define title and other basic document info
%the title should reflect the style and give a foretaste of the document
%work on making a stylized title page — or title on a page as in ARTICLE class
\title{\large \textbf{Physics Example From Knight — Friday Night Football}}
\date{28 Aug 09}                    % could use \today  , but I like this date format better
%\publisher{}                            %one day I’ll need this  😉
%\thanks{Special thanks to God for the ability to work}        %produces a footnote to the title

\definecolor{ared}{rgb}{.647,.129,.149}
\renewcommand\colorchapnum{\color{ared}}
\renewcommand\colorchaptitle{\color{ared}}
\chapterstyle{thatcher}
%one of a number of chapter styles available…this one {bringhurst} doesn’t use the ared color; bianchi, chappell, dash, lyhne, ntglike,pedersen thatcher,
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\begin{document}
%title
\thispagestyle{empty}
%\begin{minipage}{300pt}
\begin{center}{
\hrule \vspace{30pt}
\hspace{10pt} \thetitle  \vspace{30pt}
\newline \theauthor \hspace{30pt} \thedate  \vspace{26pt}
\hrule
}
\end{center}
%\end{minipage}
\clearpage

%\frontmatter    %use if needed –page numbers as lower case roman numerals i, ii,…

%\mainmatter
%%other declarations
\pagestyle{Ruled}                    %one of a number of possible page styles
\midsloppy                             %to minimize overfull lines

%Layout the page
%%Try this manual golden ratio layout or…
\settypeblocksize{*}{\lxvchars}{1.618}
\setulmargins{160pt}{*}{*}
\setlrmargins{*}{*}{1.618}
%\semiisopage[12]
%try this predefined layout — other predefined ones are options in MEMOIR…
%this one looked best but did not work

\checkandfixthelayout          %make the layout happen and provide details in log during build

\chapter{Motion With Constant Acceleration}
\section{Ex. 2.14 Friday Night Football}
\subsection{Given}
Fred catches the football while standing on the goal line and he immediately starts running forward with an acceleration of $6 \frac{ft}{s^2}$.  At the moment that Fred catches the ball, Tommy is 20 yards away and is heading directly toward Fred with a steady speed of $15 \frac{ft}{s}$. Neither player deviates from a straight-ahead path.

\subsection{Find}
Find where Tommy will tackle Fred.
\subsection{Plan}
Write equations of motion for Fred and Tommy, determine \textit{when} they will be at the same location and use this time to find \textit{where} the collision will occur.  I’ll use the same coordinate system for both Fred and Tommy with zero at the goal line and the positive direction coinciding with Fred’s direction. Since the acceleration and velocity are provided with length dimensions in feet, I convert Tommy’s initial position to feet.
\subsection{Calculations}
The equation for Fred’s position:
$x_F = \frac{1}{2} a_F t^2 + 0 \cdot t + 0$
The equation for Tommy’s position:
$x_T = 0 \cdot t^2 + v_i t + 60$
By setting these equal, we can solve for the time at which they will be at the same position.  \\\\
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{1}{2} 6 t^2 &=& -15 t + 60 \\
3 t^2 +15 t -60  &=& 0 \\
t^2 + 5t – 20    &=& 0 \\
t^2 + 5t + \left(\frac{5}{2}\right)^2 &=& 20 + \left(\frac{5}{2}\right)^2 \\
\left(t + \frac{5}{2}\right)^2 &=& \frac{105}{4} \\
t &=& \frac{-5 \pm \sqrt{105}}{2} \\
\end{eqnarray*}
Using only the positive time solution, we see that the collision occurs at
$t = \frac{-5 + \sqrt{105}}{2}$
or approximately at $t \approx 2.6 s$.\\

We can substitute this value into either Fred’s or Tommy’s position equation to find out where the collision [presumably a tackle] occurs.
$x_T = -15 (2.6) + 60 = 20.6479 \approx 21 feet$
or, right about the 7 yard line.\\

\subsection{Solution}
\begin{minipage}{300pt}
\begin{center}{
\hrule
\vspace{20pt}
Tommy tackles Fred at the seven (7) yard line.
\vspace{16pt}
\hrule
}
\end{center}
\end{minipage}

\end{document}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% SAVE THIS SECTION TO COPY AND PASTE –AS NEEDED FOR ADDITIONAL PROBLEMS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{}%<problem # goes here>}
\subsection{Given}

\subsection{Find}

\subsection{Plan}

\subsection{Calculations}
        %<math stuff here — calculations>

\subsection{Solution}
\begin{minipage}{300pt}
\begin{center}{
\hrule
\vspace{20pt}
%nicely written sentence solution goes here
\vspace{16pt}
\hrule